פוסט זה זמין גם ב:
עברית
M.M. Suverein, T.S.R. Delnoij, R. Lorusso, G.J. Brandon Bravo Bruinsma, L. Otterspoor, C.V. Elzo Kraemer,
A.P.J. Vlaar, J.J. van der Heijden, E. Scholten, C. den Uil, T. Jansen, B. van den Bogaard, M. Kuijpers, K.Y. Lam,
J.M. Montero Cabezas, A.H.G. Driessen, S.Z.H. Rittersma, B.G. Heijnen, D. Dos Reis Miranda, G. Bleeker,
J. de Metz, R.S. Hermanides, J. Lopez Matta, S. Eberl, D.W. Donker, R.J. van Thiel, S. Akin, O. van Meer,
J. Henriques, K.C. Bokhoven, L. Mandigers, J.J.H. Bunge, M.E. Bol, B. Winkens, B. Essers, P.W. Weerwind,
J.G. Maessen, and M.C.G. van de Poll
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) restores perfusion and oxygenation in a patient who does not have spontaneous circulation. The evidence with regard to the effect of extracorporeal CPR on survival with a favorable neurologic outcome in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is inconclusive.
METHODS
In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial conducted in the Netherlands, we assigned patients with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest to receive extracorporeal CPR or conventional CPR (standard advanced cardiac life support). Eligible patients were between 18 and 70 years of age, had received bystander CPR, had an initial ventricular arrhythmia, and did not have a return of spontaneous circulation within 15 minutes after CPR had been initiated. The primary outcome was survival with a favorable neurologic outcome, defined as a Cerebral Performance Category score of 1 or 2 (range, 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more severe disability) at 30 days. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis.
RESULTS
Of the 160 patients who underwent randomization, 70 were assigned to receive extracorporeal CPR and 64 to receive conventional CPR; 26 patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria at hospital admission were excluded. At 30 days, 14 patients (20%) in the extracorporeal-CPR group were alive with a favorable neurologic outcome, as compared with 10 patients (16%) in the conventional-CPR group (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.5 to 3.5; P=0.52). The number of serious adverse events per patient was similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, extracorporeal CPR and conventional CPR had similar effects on survival with a favorable neurologic outcome. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development and Maquet Cardiopulmonary [Getinge]; INCEPTION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03101787. opens in new tab.)
