פוסט זה זמין גם ב: עברית
- Emanuele Pivetta MD, PhD
- , Alberto Goffi MD
- , Maria Tizzani MD
- , Stefania M. Locatelli MD
- , Giulio Porrino MD
- , Isabel Losano MD
- , Dario Leone MD
- , Gilberto Calzolari MD
- , Matteo Vesan MD
- , Fabio Steri MD
- , Arianna Ardito MD
- , Marialessia Capuano MD
- , Maria Gelardi MD
- , Giulia Silvestri MD
- , Stefania Dutto MD
- , Maria Avolio MSc
- , Rossana Cavallo MD
- , Alice Bartalucci MD
- , Cristina Paglieri MD
- , Fulvio Morello MD, PhD
- , Lorenzo Richiardi MD, PhD
- , Milena M. Maule PhD
- and Enrico Lupia MD, PhD
Annals of Emergency Medicine, Copyright © 2020 American College of Emergency Physicians
Study objective
Accurate diagnostic testing to identify severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is critical. Although highly specific, SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has been shown in clinical practice to be affected by a noninsignificant proportion of false-negative results. This study seeks to explore whether the integration of lung ultrasonography with clinical evaluation is associated with increased sensitivity for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia, and therefore may facilitate the identification of false-negative SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results.
Methods
This prospective cohort study enrolled consecutive adult patients with symptoms potentially related to SARS-CoV-2 infection who were admitted to the emergency department (ED) of an Italian academic hospital. Immediately after the initial assessment, a lung ultrasonographic evaluation was performed and the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 infection, based on both clinical and lung ultrasonographic findings (“integrated” assessment), was recorded. RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 detection was subsequently performed.
Results
We enrolled 228 patients; 107 (46.9%) had SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sensitivity and negative predictive value of the clinical–lung ultrasonographic integrated assessment were higher than first RT-PCR result (94.4% [95% confidence interval {CI} 88.2% to 97.9%] versus 80.4% [95% CI 71.6% to 87.4%] and 95% [95% CI 89.5% to 98.2%] versus 85.2% [95% CI 78.3% to 90.6%], respectively). Among the 142 patients who initially had negative RT-PCR results, 21 tested positive at a subsequent molecular test performed within 72 hours. All these false-negative cases were correctly identified by the integrated assessment.
Conclusion
This study suggests that, in patients presenting to the ED with symptoms commonly associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, the integration of lung ultrasonography with clinical evaluation has high sensitivity and specificity for coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia and it may help to identify false-negative results occurring with RT-PCR.